HomeChemistry › Q
ChemistryAtomic Structure
Which of the following could NOT be explained by Dalton's atomic theory?
Options
1
Law of conservation of mass
2
Law of definite proportions
3
Law of multiple proportions
4
Law of gaseous volumes
Correct Answer
Law of gaseous volumes
Solution
1

Dalton's theory explains:

A. Conservation of mass — atoms indestructible ✓

B. Definite proportions — fixed atom ratio in compound ✓

C. Multiple proportions — different compounds from same elements ✓

2

D. Law of Gaseous Volumes (Gay-Lussac): volumes in simple ratios.

Dalton could NOT explain: $H_2 + Cl_2 \to 2HCl$ (1 vol + 1 vol → 2 volumes)

Needed Avogadro's hypothesis (equal volumes = equal molecules). Answer: D

Dalton failed to explain Gay-Lussac's Law of Gaseous Volumes
Reason: Dalton rejected Avogadro's hypothesis about molecules
Theory: Atomic Structure
1. Dalton's Atomic Theory (1803)

John Dalton proposed the first scientific atomic theory. Main postulates: (1) All matter is made of atoms — extremely small, indivisible particles. (2) Atoms of a given element are identical in mass and properties. Atoms of different elements have different masses. (3) Compounds are formed when atoms of different elements combine in simple whole number ratios. (4) Chemical reactions are rearrangements (combination/separation/rearrangement) of atoms. Atoms are neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions. Laws explained: Law of conservation of mass (atoms indestructible). Law of definite proportions (fixed atom ratio per compound). Law of multiple proportions (same elements in different ratios). Laws NOT fully explained: Gay-Lussac's law of combining volumes. Anomalies later discovered: Isotopes (same element, different mass — violates postulate 2). Sub-atomic particles (atoms divisible — violates postulate 1). Nuclear reactions (atoms can change — violates postulate 4).

2. Gay-Lussac's Law of Combining Volumes (1808)

When gases react, the volumes of reactants and products (at same T and P) are in simple whole number ratios. Examples: $H_2(g) + Cl_2(g) \to 2HCl(g)$: 1:1:2 volumes. $2H_2(g) + O_2(g) \to 2H_2O(g)$: 2:1:2 volumes. $N_2(g) + 3H_2(g) \to 2NH_3(g)$: 1:3:2 volumes. Dalton's problem: he only had atoms, not molecules. He could not explain how 1 volume of H₂ and 1 volume of Cl₂ give 2 volumes of HCl without splitting the H and Cl atoms. If HCl molecule has 1 H and 1 Cl, you need 2 HCl molecules from 1 H₂ molecule (split the H₂ into 2 H atoms). Dalton rejected atom-splitting, so he struggled with this law. Resolution: Avogadro (1811) proposed that gases consist of molecules (diatomic for H₂, Cl₂, etc.) and equal volumes contain equal numbers of molecules (Avogadro's hypothesis). This resolved the problem perfectly.

3. Avogadro's Hypothesis (1811)

Avogadro proposed: equal volumes of all gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules. Key difference from Dalton: Avogadro introduced the concept of a molecule (group of atoms bonded together) as distinct from an atom. Diatomic molecules: H₂, O₂, N₂, Cl₂, Br₂, F₂, I₂. Explanation of Gay-Lussac: H₂ + Cl₂ → 2HCl. 1 molecule H₂ + 1 molecule Cl₂ → 2 molecules HCl. 1 volume + 1 volume → 2 volumes (since each volume has same number of molecules). Avogadro's hypothesis was largely ignored for 50 years (Dalton opposed it). Cannizzaro (1858) revived it and used it to establish consistent atomic masses. This became the foundation of modern chemistry. Avogadro's number $N_A = 6.022 \times 10^{23}$: number of molecules in one mole (his hypothesis finally quantified centuries later).

4. Discovery of Electrons and Cathode Ray Experiments

J.J. Thomson (1897): cathode ray tube experiments. Evacuated tube with high voltage → rays travel from cathode to anode. These rays: deflect in electric and magnetic fields (negatively charged). Same regardless of cathode material (universal particle). Specific charge $e/m = 1.76 \times 10^{11}$ C/kg (always same). Conclusion: electrons are fundamental negatively charged particles present in all atoms. Thomson's "plum pudding" model: positive sphere (pudding) with electrons (plums) embedded. Millikan oil drop experiment (1909): measured charge of electron $e = 1.602 \times 10^{-19}$ C. From $e$ and $e/m$: mass of electron $m_e = 9.11 \times 10^{-31}$ kg $= 1/1836$ of proton mass.

5. Rutherford's Nuclear Model (1911)

Geiger-Marsden experiment: α particles (from Ra) fired at thin gold foil. Expected (Thomson model): α particles should pass through with slight deflection (positive charge spread out). Observed: most α pass through undeflected (large empty space). Few deflect at large angles. Very few (1 in 20,000) deflect back. Conclusion: most mass concentrated in tiny nucleus (diameter ~10⁻¹⁵ m vs atom 10⁻¹⁰ m). Nucleus is positive. Electrons orbit outside. Nuclear model: positive nucleus + electrons outside. Failures: (1) Could not explain stability of atom (orbiting electron should radiate energy and spiral into nucleus — Maxwell's equations predict this). (2) Could not explain discrete line spectra of hydrogen (orbit of any radius should be possible). Bohr (1913) resolved these by quantizing orbits.

6. Bohr's Atomic Model

Bohr (1913) postulated: (1) Electrons orbit nucleus in specific allowed orbits without radiating. (2) Angular momentum quantized: $L = mvr = n\hbar$. (3) Energy emitted/absorbed only during transitions: $h\nu = E_1 - E_2$. Results for hydrogen: $r_n = n^2 a_0$ (a₀ = 0.529 Å). $E_n = -13.6/n^2$ eV. Explained: hydrogen spectrum perfectly (Lyman, Balmer, Paschen series). Rydberg constant $R_H$ predicted from first principles. Failures: (1) Cannot explain spectra of multi-electron atoms. (2) Cannot explain fine structure (Zeeman effect). (3) Violates Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Modern quantum mechanics (Schrödinger equation, 1926) overcame all these. Still useful as first approximation.

7. Quantum Mechanical Model

Heisenberg uncertainty: $\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \hbar/2$. Cannot simultaneously determine exact position and momentum of electron. de Broglie: $\lambda = h/(mv)$. Schrödinger (1926): $\hat{H}\psi = E\psi$ (time-independent). $\psi$ = wave function, $|\psi|^2$ = probability density. Quantum numbers: $n$ (principal), $l$ (azimuthal), $m_l$ (magnetic), $m_s$ (spin). Orbitals: regions of space with 90-95% probability of finding electron. Shapes: s (spherical), p (dumbbell), d (complex), f (more complex). Aufbau, Hund, Pauli rules for electronic configuration. This model fully explains: spectral lines (including fine structure), chemical bonding (MO theory), magnetic properties, periodic trends.

8. Subatomic Particles

Electron: charge $-e = -1.602\times10^{-19}$ C, mass $9.109\times10^{-31}$ kg. Discovered by J.J. Thomson. Proton: charge $+e$, mass $1.673\times10^{-27}$ kg $= 1836 m_e$. Discovered by Rutherford (1918) from H⁺. Neutron: no charge, mass $1.675\times10^{-27}$ kg ≈ proton mass. Discovered by Chadwick (1932). In atomic nucleus. Essential for nuclear stability (proton-proton repulsion overcome by nuclear force involving neutrons). Positron ($e^+$): same mass as electron, charge $+e$. Antiparticle of electron. Detected by Anderson (1932). Neutrino ($\nu$): near-massless, neutral. Emitted in beta decay. Detected (1956) after 26 years of theoretical prediction. Quarks: fundamental particles. Proton = 2 up + 1 down quark. Neutron = 1 up + 2 down. 6 types (flavours): up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom. Held together by gluons (strong nuclear force).

Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why did Dalton reject Avogadro's hypothesis?
Dalton's fundamental postulate was that atoms are indivisible. Avogadro proposed that diatomic molecules like H₂ exist. For Gay-Lussac's law H₂ + Cl₂ → 2HCl to work with 1:1:2 volumes, you need 1 H₂ molecule + 1 Cl₂ molecule → 2 HCl molecules. This means the H₂ molecule must "split" into 2 H atoms and Cl₂ into 2 Cl atoms. Dalton saw this as violating his indivisibility of atoms — he confused molecules with atoms! He thought Avogadro was proposing that atoms split during reactions. In reality, Avogadro was proposing molecules (multiple atoms bonded together) — which can indeed break apart without violating atomic indivisibility. Dalton's conceptual error prevented him from accepting Avogadro's perfectly valid hypothesis.
2. What are the main limitations of Dalton's atomic theory?
(1) Cannot explain Gay-Lussac's law: rejected Avogadro's molecular hypothesis. (2) Atoms of same element not always identical: isotopes discovered later (same Z, different mass numbers). Example: ¹²C and ¹³C and ¹⁴C are all carbon but different masses. (3) Atoms are NOT indivisible: electrons (Thomson, 1897), protons (Rutherford, 1918), neutrons (Chadwick, 1932), and further quarks, leptons. (4) In nuclear reactions: atoms transmute (one element changes to another by radioactive decay or nuclear bombardment) — violates Dalton's indestructibility of atoms. (5) Isoelectronic species (same electronic structure) and allotropes (different arrangements of same atoms) not addressed. Despite these failures, Dalton's theory remains the foundation of modern chemistry.
3. State Gay-Lussac's Law of Combining Volumes with an example?
Gay-Lussac (1808): When gases react at constant temperature and pressure, the volumes of reactant and product gases bear simple whole number ratios. Example 1: $N_2(g) + 3H_2(g) \to 2NH_3(g)$. Volume ratio: 1:3:2. If 10 L N₂ reacts: need 30 L H₂, produce 20 L NH₃. Example 2: $2CO(g) + O_2(g) \to 2CO_2(g)$. Volume ratio: 2:1:2. 20 L CO + 10 L O₂ → 20 L CO₂. Example 3: $CO(g) + 2H_2(g) \to CH_3OH(g)$. 1:2:1. This law is derived from Avogadro's hypothesis: equal volumes contain equal molecules → volume ratios = molecule ratios = stoichiometric coefficients in balanced equation.
4. How did Thomson's plum pudding model explain atomic neutrality?
Thomson proposed: atom is a sphere of uniformly distributed positive charge (the "pudding") in which electrons (the "plums") are embedded and free to move. Total positive charge = total negative charge (from electrons) → atom is neutral. The electrons were thought to be arranged in stable rings within the positive sphere. This model predicted: atom is soft and "spongy" (positive charge spread out). α particles should barely deflect when passing through. Rutherford's gold foil experiment disproved this: most α particles passed straight through (consistent with mostly empty space) but a few deflected at large angles (inconsistent with distributed positive charge — showed concentrated positive nucleus). Thomson's model was elegantly simple but experimentally wrong.
5. What is the mass number and how does it differ from atomic number?
Atomic number (Z) = number of protons in nucleus = number of electrons in neutral atom. Determines the element (chemical identity). Mass number (A) = number of protons + neutrons = Z + N. Approximately equals atomic mass in amu. Isotopes: same Z, different A (different number of neutrons). ¹²C (Z=6, N=6), ¹³C (Z=6, N=7), ¹⁴C (Z=6, N=8) — all carbon. Isobars: same A, different Z. ¹⁴C (Z=6) and ¹⁴N (Z=7). Isotones: same N, different Z. ¹³C (N=7) and ¹⁴N (N=7). Atomic mass: weighted average of all naturally occurring isotopes. Carbon atomic mass = 12.011 (since mostly ¹²C with small amounts of ¹³C). Chlorine: 35.45 (75.77% ³⁵Cl + 24.23% ³⁷Cl → 0.7577×35 + 0.2423×37 = 35.45).
Previous Questions
Q.
Lassaigne test sodium fusion NaCN Na2S NaCl NOT CuO carbon detection organic
Chemistry · Answer: 2CuO + C → 2Cu + CO₂
Q.
Acidity order carboxylic acids HCOOH CH3COOH isobutyric pivalic I II III IV
Chemistry · Answer: I > II > III > IV
Q.
Kp Kc N2 3H2 2NH3 delta ng minus 2 Kp less Kc both correct explanation
Chemistry · Answer: Both correct, II explains I
Q.
Highest boiling point 0.1M glucose 0.05M NaCl 0.01M Na2SO4 0.1M MgSO4
Chemistry · Answer: 0.01 M Na₂SO₄
Q.
Ionisation water Kw increases temperature Statement I correct II incorrect
Chemistry · Answer: I correct, II incorrect