HomeBiology › Q
BiologyGenetics / Mendelism
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion A and the other labelled as Reason R:
Assertion A: In Mendel's experiment with pea plants, the F1 progeny obtained from a cross between tall and dwarf plants were all tall.
Reason R: The allele for tallness is dominant over the allele for dwarfness.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer:
Options
1
Both A and R are correct and R is NOT the correct explanation of A
2
A is correct but R is not correct
3
Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
4
A is not correct but R is correct
Correct Answer
Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
Solution
1

A: Cross TT (tall) × tt (dwarf) → F1 = all Tt = all TALL = TRUE ✓

2

R: T (tall) is dominant over t (dwarf) = TRUE ✓

R explains A: F1 is Tt — T is expressed (dominant), t is masked → plants appear tall.

Answer: Both A and R correct, R explains A

TT × tt → F1 all Tt (all TALL) — because T is dominant over t
Law of Dominance: dominant allele expressed, recessive masked in heterozygote
Theory: Genetics / Mendelism
1. Gregor Mendel — Father of Genetics

Gregor Johann Mendel (1822-1884) was an Augustinian friar and scientist in Brno (now Czech Republic) whose meticulous experimental work with garden peas between 1856 and 1863 established the foundational principles of heredity that were later recognised as the foundation of modern genetics. Mendel conducted approximately 29,000 pea plants across eight years of experiments, using his mathematical background to quantitatively analyse the inheritance patterns he observed and derive statistical ratios — an approach unprecedented in biology at the time. He published his results in 1866 in "Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden" (Experiments on Plant Hybridisation), a paper that was largely ignored by the scientific community until 1900, when three scientists (de Vries, Correns, and von Tschermak) independently rediscovered similar results and recognised Mendel's prior work, triggering the "rediscovery of Mendel" and the establishment of genetics as a scientific discipline.

2. Mendel's Laws of Inheritance

From his pea experiments, Mendel formulated three fundamental laws: Law of Dominance: when two contrasting alleles are present in an organism (heterozygous), only one (dominant) is expressed in the phenotype; the other (recessive) is masked but not lost, and can reappear in later generations. Law of Segregation (Law of Purity of Gametes): the two alleles of each gene segregate (separate) during gamete formation, so each gamete contains only one allele for each trait. These alleles reunite randomly during fertilisation. Demonstrated by the 3:1 F2 phenotypic ratio in monohybrid crosses. Law of Independent Assortment: alleles of different genes (on different chromosomes or far apart on the same chromosome) assort independently during gamete formation. Demonstrated by 9:3:3:1 F2 phenotypic ratio in dihybrid crosses. Note: Mendel's third law has exceptions when genes are linked (on the same chromosome), as discovered by Morgan and Sturtevant.

3. The Monohybrid Cross in Detail

The monohybrid cross — crossing plants differing in a single trait — was Mendel's fundamental experimental approach. Using stem height as the example: P generation (parental): pure-breeding tall (TT) × pure-breeding dwarf (tt). TT plants produce only T gametes; tt plants produce only t gametes. F1 generation: all offspring receive T from the tall parent and t from the dwarf parent → all Tt (heterozygous). Phenotype: all tall (because T is dominant over t). This result demonstrates the Law of Dominance — in Tt plants, T is expressed and t is suppressed. F1 self-cross (F1 × F1, Tt × Tt): each Tt plant produces both T and t gametes in equal proportions (1/2 T gametes, 1/2 t gametes). Random fertilisation: TT (1/4), Tt (2/4), tt (1/4). Genotype ratio: 1 TT : 2 Tt : 1 tt. Phenotype ratio: 3 tall (TT + Tt) : 1 dwarf (tt) = 3:1. The reappearance of the dwarf phenotype in F2 (in a predictable 1/4 proportion) confirmed that the recessive character was NOT destroyed in F1 but only masked — a profound insight supporting the particulate theory of inheritance against the then-prevailing blending inheritance hypothesis.

4. Dominance Mechanisms at Molecular Level

While Mendel described dominance as a phenotypic pattern (dominant trait is expressed when at least one dominant allele is present), the molecular mechanisms underlying dominance vary by gene and trait. Haploinsufficiency: the recessive phenotype appears when only one functional copy of the gene is present because one copy produces insufficient protein for normal phenotype — NOT the typical Mendelian pattern where one copy IS sufficient (this is why most loss-of-function mutations are recessive — one functional copy produces enough protein). Complete dominance (classical Mendelian): one functional allele produces sufficient protein/enzyme product for full phenotype expression, so the heterozygote looks identical to the dominant homozygote. For stem height in peas, the dominant T allele encodes a functional enzyme (Le enzyme, a gibberellin biosynthesis enzyme) producing sufficient GA to give full stem elongation; the recessive t allele has a loss-of-function mutation reducing GA, and one functional T allele in Tt plants produces enough GA for full height. Incomplete dominance (non-Mendelian): neither allele is fully dominant — F1 hybrid shows an intermediate phenotype (e.g., red × white → pink in snapdragons, 1:2:1 ratio in F2 rather than 3:1). Codominance: both alleles are fully expressed simultaneously in the heterozygote (e.g., AB blood type where both IA and IB alleles are fully expressed).

Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why was Mendel's work ignored for 35 years after publication, and what made it significant when rediscovered in 1900?
The neglect of Mendel's 1866 paper for 35 years, followed by its sudden recognition in 1900 as the foundation of a new science, represents one of the most famous cases of delayed scientific recognition in history, attributable to a combination of factors related to scientific communication, the state of biological knowledge at the time, and the revolutionary nature of Mendel's approach. First, the paper was published in the Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Brünn — a regional journal in a small Central European city, with limited distribution and visibility to the broader European and international scientific community. Second, and perhaps more fundamentally, Mendel's work required both a mathematical/statistical understanding and a conceptual framework (the idea of discrete, particulate units of heredity) that most biologists of the time lacked and were not ready to appreciate. The prevailing theory of heredity in 1866 was blending inheritance — the idea that offspring inherited a blend of their parents' characteristics, like mixing two differently coloured paints — which was incompatible with Mendel's finding of distinct 3:1 ratios and the reappearance of recessive characters. Darwin himself, despite corresponding with Galton about heredity and desperately needing a mechanism for inheritance consistent with his natural selection theory, apparently never read or appreciated Mendel's paper. When de Vries, Correns, and von Tschermak independently rediscovered similar patterns in 1900, the scientific context had fundamentally changed: Weismann had established the continuity of germ plasm, the chromosomal theory of cell division (mitosis and meiosis) had been worked out by Flemming, Strasburger, and others, and scientists were actively searching for the physical basis of heredity in chromosomes. The discovery of discrete chromosomal entities that segregate during meiosis provided exactly the physical mechanism that Mendel's abstract "factors" required, making the 1900 rediscoverers immediately recognise the profound significance of Mendel's earlier work as providing quantitative laws describing exactly the segregation behaviour of the chromosomal hereditary units they were already studying, triggering the rapid synthesis of Mendelian genetics and cytology (chromosome biology) that established modern genetics within just a decade of the 1900 rediscovery.
Previous Questions
Q.
Anther lobe theca microsporangia pollen sac dithecous microsporogenesis tapetum sporopollenin
Biology . 2
Q.
Biotechnology transformation cloning site selectable marker ori recombinant DNA plasmid match
Biology . A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Q.
Bt toxin Bacillus thuringiensis alkaline pH insect midgut protoxin Cry protein Bt cotton
Biology . Alkaline pH
Q.
Tricuspid valve right atrium ventricle bicuspid mitral semilunar heart
Biology . Tricuspid valve
Q.
Mad cow disease BSE prion misfolded protein viroid kuru scrapie vCJD
Biology . Prions