HomeBiology › Q
BiologyEvolution
Assertion (A): Natural selection is the mechanism of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin.
Reason (R): Natural selection acts on the heritable variation present in population, and individuals with favourable variations survive and reproduce more successfully.
Choose the correct option:
Options
1
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
2
Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
3
A is true but R is false
4
A is false but R is true
Correct Answer
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Solution
1

Assertion A: Darwin proposed natural selection as mechanism of evolution. TRUE ✓

Published in "On the Origin of Species" (1859). Natural selection = individuals with favourable heritable traits reproduce more.

2

Reason R: Natural selection acts on heritable variation; favourable variants survive and reproduce more. TRUE ✓

R correctly explains the mechanism by which A works. Answer: Both true, R explains A

Both A and R true. R is the correct explanation of A.
Darwin: natural selection on heritable variation → differential reproduction → evolution
Theory: Evolution
1. Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection

Charles Darwin (1809-1882): published "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection" (1859). Alfred Russel Wallace co-developed the theory independently (1858). Darwin's observations during Beagle voyage (1831-1836): especially Galapagos finches (14 species from one ancestor, different beak shapes for different food sources). Darwin's arguments for natural selection: (1) Overproduction: all species produce more offspring than can survive. (2) Struggle for existence: competition for limited resources. (3) Variation: individuals within a population vary in heritable traits. (4) Survival of the fittest: individuals with favourable variations survive more often (differential survival). (5) Inheritance of favourable traits: survivors pass on their advantages. (6) Gradual accumulation of differences → new species. What Darwin did NOT know: mechanism of inheritance (genes), source of new variation (mutations), molecular basis. Neo-Darwinism/Modern Synthesis (1930s-1950s) integrated Darwin's theory with Mendelian genetics and population genetics.

2. Evidences for Evolution

Fossil evidence: preserved remains/impressions of past organisms. Geological strata → relative dating. Carbon-14 (up to 50,000 yr), uranium-lead (millions of years) → absolute dating. Transitional fossils: Archaeopteryx (reptile-bird), Tiktaalik (fish-tetrapod), Pakicetus (land mammal-whale). Comparative anatomy: Homologous organs: same structure, different function. Forelimb of human, whale, bat, horse (all have same bones: humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, phalanges) → common ancestry. Analogous organs: different structure, same function. Wings of bird and butterfly → convergent evolution. Vestigial organs: reduced, non-functional structures from ancestors. Human: appendix, ear muscles, coccyx, wisdom teeth. Whale: pelvic bones. Embryological evidence: embryos of vertebrates are very similar in early stages → shared ancestry. Gill slits and tails in human embryos (Haeckel's recapitulation theory — "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" is an oversimplification but embryological similarities are real evidence).

3. Types of Natural Selection

Directional selection: shifts the population mean in one direction. Example: peppered moth (Biston betularia) — industrial melanism. Before industrialisation: light-coloured moths survived on lichen-covered trees. After: soot covered trees → dark moths survived → dark allele increased. Reverse after pollution reduction. Stabilising selection: favours intermediate phenotypes, reduces variation. Example: human birth weight (too small or too large → higher mortality; intermediate weight most survive). Most common type in stable environments. Disruptive (diversifying) selection: favours both extremes, eliminates intermediate. Rare. Example: Coho salmon (two male morphs: large aggressive vs small "sneaker" males). Can lead to sympatric speciation. Sexual selection: mates choose based on certain traits → evolution of secondary sex characters. Example: peacock tail (reduces survival but increases mating success), stag antlers, bird of paradise plumage. Can oppose natural selection.

4. Modern Synthetic Theory (Neo-Darwinism)

Modern Synthesis integrated: Darwin's natural selection + Mendelian genetics + population genetics (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium) + mutation theory (de Vries) + geographical isolation (speciation). Main components: (1) Mutation: ultimate source of new alleles. (2) Recombination: reshuffles existing alleles → new genotype combinations. (3) Natural selection: changes allele frequencies. (4) Genetic drift: random changes in allele frequencies (important in small populations). (5) Gene flow: movement of alleles between populations (reduces differentiation). (6) Isolation: geographic, reproductive → prevents gene flow → speciation. Hardy-Weinberg law: in a large random-mating population without selection, mutation, migration, or drift: allele frequencies remain constant (equilibrium). Deviations from HW = evolution is occurring.

5. Speciation

Speciation: formation of new species from existing species. Allopatric speciation (geographic isolation): populations physically separated (mountain, ocean, desert) → different selective pressures → accumulate differences → reproductive isolation develops. Example: Darwin's finches, Hawaiian honeycreepers. Sympatric speciation: new species form without geographic isolation. Rarer in animals, more common in plants. Mechanisms: polyploidy (especially in plants, e.g., wheat = hexaploid), habitat differentiation, assortative mating. Species concept: Biological species concept (Mayr): group of organisms that can interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Limitations: doesn't apply to asexual organisms, allopatric populations, fossils. Other concepts: morphological, phylogenetic, ecological. Hybrid zones: areas where two partially reproductively isolated species meet and occasionally hybridise. Can be stabile or expand/collapse.

6. Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change

Mutation: changes in DNA sequence. Point mutations (substitution, insertion, deletion). Chromosomal mutations (inversion, translocation, deletion, duplication). Most mutations are neutral or slightly deleterious. Positive mutations rare but crucial. Mutation rate: ~10⁻⁸ to 10⁻⁶ per nucleotide per replication. Recombination: crossing over during meiosis → new allele combinations. Sexual reproduction greatly amplifies variation available for selection. Genetic drift: random changes in allele frequency. Important in small populations. Founder effect: small group establishes new population → limited genetic diversity. Example: Old Order Amish (Ellis-van Creveld syndrome). Bottleneck effect: population reduced drastically → loss of alleles. Example: cheetahs (extremely low genetic diversity). Gene flow/Migration: movement of individuals/gametes between populations → homogenises allele frequencies → reduces population differentiation.

7. Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

H-W Law: in ideal population (large, random mating, no mutation, no selection, no migration): allele frequencies remain constant. If allele A has frequency $p$ and allele a has frequency $q$ ($p + q = 1$): genotype frequencies = $p^2$ (AA) + $2pq$ (Aa) + $q^2$ (aa) = 1. Uses: (1) Baseline to measure evolution (deviations from HW = evolution). (2) Calculate allele frequencies from phenotype data. Example: if 1% of population shows recessive phenotype ($q^2 = 0.01$): $q = 0.1$, $p = 0.9$, carrier frequency $= 2pq = 2(0.9)(0.1) = 18\%$. Agents of evolutionary change (disturb H-W): mutation, natural selection, genetic drift, gene flow (migration), non-random mating. NEET application: calculate carrier frequency for autosomal recessive conditions.

8. Human Evolution

Primates: order including prosimians, monkeys, apes, humans. Evolved from insectivore-like ancestors ~80 million years ago (MYA). Key evolutionary events: 55 MYA: first primates. 35 MYA: Old World monkeys separate. 25 MYA: gibbons separate. 15 MYA: orangutans. 10 MYA: gorillas. 7 MYA: chimpanzee and human lineages diverge. ~7% DNA difference between human and chimp (98%+ similar). Hominid evolution: Australopithecus (~4 MYA, Africa, bipedal, small brain ~400 cc). Homo habilis (2.5-1.5 MYA, first tool use, brain ~650 cc). Homo erectus (1.8-0.3 MYA, spread out of Africa, fire, brain ~900-1100 cc). Homo heidelbergensis (0.7-0.2 MYA). Homo neanderthalensis (400-40,000 years ago, Europe/Middle East, brain ~1450 cc, ritual burial). Homo sapiens (anatomically modern: 300,000 years ago; behaviourally modern: 50,000 years ago). Out of Africa hypothesis: modern humans evolved in Africa then spread worldwide and replaced archaic humans.

Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why is natural selection considered a "blind" process?
Natural selection is "blind" because it has no foresight or purpose — it simply favours traits that increase reproductive success in the CURRENT environment. It cannot plan for future changes. Example: antibiotic resistance in bacteria develops because rare resistant mutants survive antibiotic treatment — not because the bacteria "know" they need to become resistant. The resistance mutation existed randomly before antibiotic exposure; selection simply increased its frequency. Similarly, the Galapagos finches did not "decide" to develop different beak shapes — birds with beak shapes suited to available food sources survived better in their specific island environment. Natural selection is also "local" — it optimises for current conditions, not absolute perfection. This is why vestigial organs exist (appendix, ear muscles) — they were useful in ancestors and are not yet eliminated because they are not sufficiently harmful to select against.
2. What is the difference between Darwinism and Lamarckism?
Lamarck (1809, "Philosophie Zoologique"): proposed inheritance of acquired characteristics. Two laws: (1) Use and disuse: organs used more develop; unused organs degenerate. (2) Inheritance of acquired characters: traits acquired during lifetime are passed to offspring. Example: giraffes stretched necks reaching higher leaves → offspring inherited longer necks. Darwinism: variation exists naturally in population. Natural selection acts on this pre-existing variation — does not create it. Acquired characters (muscle development from exercise, tanned skin, etc.) are NOT inherited because somatic changes do not affect germline DNA (Weismann barrier). Molecular support for Darwin: Lamarckian inheritance is impossible under normal circumstances (changes to somatic cell DNA are not transmitted via gametes). Neo-Lamarckism/Epigenetics: some epigenetic changes CAN be transgenerationally inherited — this is an active research area but does not support Lamarck's mechanism.
3. What is "fitness" in the context of natural selection?
Evolutionary fitness is NOT the same as physical fitness or strength. Fitness = reproductive success = number of offspring an individual produces that survive to reproduce. An organism with high fitness contributes more genes to the next generation. A fragile orchid that produces 10,000 seeds may be "fitter" than a powerful tiger that has 2 cubs. Relative fitness: compared to other genotypes in the same population. Absolute fitness = number of offspring; relative fitness = scaled to most successful genotype. Examples: Peacock tail: male with most elaborate tail has highest mating success → highest fitness despite tail reducing survival (predation risk). Sickle cell trait: heterozygotes (HbA/HbS) have higher fitness in malaria-endemic regions than either homozygote (HbA/HbA susceptible to malaria; HbS/HbS dies of sickle cell disease). This is balancing selection (heterozygote advantage/overdominance).
4. Explain industrial melanism as evidence for natural selection?
Peppered moth (Biston betularia) study (Kettlewell): Two forms: light-coloured (typica) and dark/melanic (carbonaria). Before industrialisation (pre-1850s): lichen-covered trees → light moths camouflaged → survived better. Dark moths were rare (visible to predators). After industrialisation: soot covered tree bark → dark moths camouflaged → light moths visible and eaten more. By 1900: dark moths were 98% of population in polluted areas. After Clean Air Acts (1950s-1970s): lichen returned → light moths increased again in cleaned areas. This is directional selection: changed environment → changed selection pressure → changed allele frequency. Criticised: Kettlewell's photos were staged (moths placed unnaturally) but the core observation (frequency changes) is valid and replicated.
5. What is sexual selection and how does it differ from natural selection?
Both are forms of selection (differential reproduction based on heritable traits). Natural selection: traits increase survival AND reproduction relative to environment. Sexual selection: traits increase reproductive SUCCESS specifically through mate choice or competition, even if they reduce survival. Two types: Intrasexual selection (male-male competition): antlers in deer, horns in beetles. Traits that help males compete for females. Intersexual selection (female choice): peacock tail, bird of paradise plumage, red-winged blackbird epaulettes. Males evolve elaborate ornaments because females prefer them. Runaway selection (Fisher's runaway): once females have a preference, males with preferred trait AND sons of those males succeed → positive feedback → trait exaggerates beyond practical utility (e.g., peacock tail becomes absurdly large). Handicap principle (Zahavi): elaborate ornaments are "honest signals" — only genuinely fit males can afford the cost of maintaining them.
Previous Questions
Q.
Ecosystem productivity unit KCal m-2 yr-1 GPP NPP measurement
Biology · Answer: (KCal m⁻²) yr⁻¹
Q.
Colloids types sol gel foam aerosol paint cheese whipped cream fog
Chemistry · Answer: A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Q.
Xenon hybridisation XeO3 sp3 XeF2 sp3d XeOF4 sp3d2 XeF6 sp3d3
Chemistry · Answer: A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Q.
N2 O2 2NO endothermic high temperature A C E only equilibrium
Chemistry · Answer: A, C and E only
Q.
Dalton atomic theory law of gaseous volumes Gay-Lussac Avogadro
Chemistry · Answer: Law of gaseous volumes