$B = \mu_0 nI$; flux per turn $= B\pi r^2 = \mu_0 nI\pi r^2$
Total flux linkage $= nl \cdot \mu_0 nI\pi r^2$
$L = \Lambda/I = \mu_0 n^2 \pi r^2 l = \mu_0 \pi n^2 r^2 l$
Answer: $\mu_0 \pi n^2 r^2 l$
$\varepsilon = -L\frac{dI}{dt}$ (back-EMF opposes change in current; Lenz\'s law). $\Lambda = LI$ (flux linkage). $L$ depends only on geometry and medium, not on current. Solenoid: $L = \mu_0 n^2 V$ (volume $V = Al$). Toroid: $L = \mu_0 N^2 A/2\pi r$. Inductors in series: $L_{eq} = \sum L_i$. In parallel: $1/L_{eq} = \sum 1/L_i$ (no mutual inductance).
Resistor: $V = IR$, in phase. Inductor: $V = IX_L$ where $X_L = \omega L$; $V$ leads $I$ by 90°. Capacitor: $V = IX_C$ where $X_C = 1/\omega C$; $V$ lags $I$ by 90°. Series LCR: $Z = \sqrt{R^2 + (X_L-X_C)^2}$; $\tan\phi = (X_L-X_C)/R$. Resonance: $X_L = X_C$ → $\omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC}$, $Z = R$ (minimum impedance). Power factor $\cos\phi = R/Z$; average power $P = V_{rms}I_{rms}\cos\phi$.
Transformer: $V_s/V_p = N_s/N_p = I_p/I_s$ (for ideal, lossless transformer). Step-up: $N_s > N_p$ → $V_s > V_p$, $I_s < I_p$. Step-down: $N_s < N_p$ → $V_s < V_p$, $I_s > I_p$. Power: $P_{in} = P_{out}$ (ideal). Losses: eddy currents (reduced by lamination), hysteresis (heat from repeated magnetisation), resistance heating in windings. Efficiency typically 95-99% for large power transformers.
Electric generator: mechanical energy → electrical energy (Faraday\'s law). $\varepsilon = NBA\omega\sin(\omega t) = \varepsilon_0\sin(\omega t)$ for rotating coil in magnetic field. Electric motor: electrical → mechanical (current-carrying conductor in field experiences force). Induction cooktop: alternating current in coil induces eddy currents in the ferromagnetic cooking vessel, which heats up. MRI: strong, uniform magnetic field + radio-frequency pulses excite nuclear spins → signals detected.
Self-inductance is defined by $\phi = LI$, and the induced emf is $e = -L\frac{dI}{dt}$. For a long solenoid $L = \mu_0 n^2 A l$, so inductance depends on the geometry and the core material, never on the current flowing. Note the $n^2$: doubling the turns per unit length quadruples the inductance. Inserting an iron core multiplies L by the relative permeability, which is why practical inductors are wound on cores.
Building up a current against the back-emf requires work, and that energy is stored in the magnetic field as $U = \frac{1}{2}LI^2$. The form mirrors $\frac{1}{2}CV^2$ for a capacitor and $\frac{1}{2}mv^2$ for a moving mass — inductance is the electrical analogue of inertia. This is also why current through an inductor cannot change instantly, and why breaking an inductive circuit produces a spark as the stored energy is forced out.
Mutual inductance $M$ relates the emf in one coil to the rate of change of current in another, and it is the principle behind the transformer, where $\frac{V_s}{V_p} = \frac{N_s}{N_p}$. Transformers work only on AC, because a steady current produces no changing flux. Real losses come from copper heating, eddy currents (reduced by laminating the core), hysteresis and flux leakage — a list worth having ready, since it is a standard three-mark question.
Thinking inductance depends on current. L is fixed by the coil's geometry and core. Changing the current changes the stored energy and the induced emf, not L.
Applying the transformer relation to DC. No changing flux means no induced emf. A transformer connected to DC does nothing except overheat.